Frontier Lithium Inc. (TSXV: FL) (OTCQX: LITOF) ("Frontier" or "the Company") is pleased to announce the results of the three remaining drill holes and supplemental channels completed during the Phase X drill program on the Spark pegmatite, the second delineated premium spodumene-bearing lithium deposit on the PAK Lithium Project.
Highlights:
"We are extremely pleased with these results as they confirm continuity in quality and grade of the Spark deposit and they continue to increase the size of the resource," states Garth Drever, V.P. Exploration and added "With the grade-thickness persisting at depth, the Spark deposit contains significant potential for growth."
The objectives for the Phase X drill program in September-October 2021 were to complete drill targets considered vital for completing a Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS). Figure 1 is a location map showing the project area including Frontier's land tenure, geology, and location of the three pegmatites, PAK, Bolt and Spark while Figure 2 is a plan map of the Spark pegmatite with drill hole traces highlighting the last three holes and two channels being reported. Table 1 details the mineralized intersections in holes PL-050-21 to PL-052-21 while Table 2 is a summary of all the Phase X drill holes. Table 3 details the mineralized intervals of the channels cut at Spark and Table 4 is a summary of the channels.
Table 1: Details of Mineralized Intersections in Drill Holes
DDH PL-050-21 | Planned to test continuity of the pegmatite between PL-041-19 and PL-042-19 below channels 33-35 and at a steeper dip (-70°). The hole intersected primarily mineralized pegmatite from surface to 417m representing a horizontal and vertical distance of 143 and 392 m respectively. Minor mafic metavolcanics up to 5m wide occur with one 11.5 m mafic zone from 154.7 to 165.3m. The total pegmatite intersected was 405m averaging 1.5% Li2O. | ||||||||||
Zone | From | To | Width | Li2O | Cs2O | Ta2O5 | Nb2O5 | SnO2 | Rb2O | Unit | |
Lithium Enriched | 0.0 | 154.7 | 154.7 | 1.52 | 0.02 | 124 | 95 | 54 | 0.32 | Aplite-Pegmatite | |
including | 0.0 | 36.0 | 36.0 | 1.65 | 0.02 | 135 | 91 | 48 | 0.33 | Aplite-Pegmatite | |
including | 64.0 | 149.0 | 85.0 | 1.85 | 0.03 | 116 | 95 | 53 | 0.35 | Aplite- Pegmatite | |
Lithium Enriched | 166.2 | 417.0 | 250.9 | 1.48 | 0.01 | 64 | 86 | 47 | 0.23 | Pegmatite Aplite | |
including | 168.0 | 369.0 | 201.0 | 1.68 | 0.01 | 71 | 86 | 44 | 0.23 | Pegmatite-Aplite | |
including | 305.0 | 365.0 | 60.0 | 2.00 | 0.01 | 45 | 82 | 43 | 0.21 | Aplite-Pegmatite | |
DDH PL-051-21 | Planned to test continuity of the pegmatite between PL-042-19 and PL-044-19 and to "scissor" PL-039-19. The hole intersected predominately pegmatite with intervals of mafic metavolcanics a few metres to 25m wide from surface to 302m. The total pegmatite intersected between surface to 302m includes 264m averaging 1.6% Li2O. The 100m section from 190 to 290m averaged just over 2.2% Li2O. | ||||||||||
Zone | From | To | Width | Li2O | Cs2O | Ta2O5 | Nb2O5 | SnO2 | Rb2O | Unit | |
Lithium Enriched | 0.6 | 56.3 | 55.7 | 1.37 | 0.02 | 59 | 74 | 50 | 0.34 | Pegmatite | |
including | 0.6 | 10.0 | 9.4 | 1.61 | 0.02 | 44 | 65 | 59 | 0.29 | Pegmatite | |
including | 36.0 | 46.0 | 10.0 | 2.03 | 0.01 | 38 | 66 | 50 | 0.27 | Pegmatite | |
Lithium Enriched | 63.7 | 90.5 | 26.8 | 1.06 | 0.02 | 121 | 113 | 42 | 0.15 | Aplite-Pegmatite | |
including | 63.7 | 81.5 | 17.8 | 1.48 | 0.02 | 105 | 98 | 41 | 0.16 | Aplite-Pegmatite | |
including | 71.0 | 81.5 | 10.5 | 2.14 | 0.01 | 89 | 87 | 40 | 0.18 | Aplite-Pegmatite | |
Lithium Enriched | 114.9 | 160.0 | 45.1 | 1.53 | 0.02 | 85 | 69 | 49 | 0.25 | Pegmatite with metavolcanics | |
including | 114.9 | 131.0 | 16.1 | 1.91 | 0.01 | 87 | 76 | 44 | 0.26 | Pegmatite | |
including | 149.0 | 157.0 | 8.0 | 1.83 | 0.03 | 87 | 73 | 53 | 0.21 | Pegmatite | |
Lithium Enriched | 165.6 | 302.0 | 136.5 | 1.82 | 0.02 | 88 | 91 | 44 | 0.27 | Pegmatite-Aplite | |
including | 190.0 | 290.0 | 100.0 | 2.21 | 0.02 | 79 | 86 | 38 | 0.26 | Aplite-Pegmatite | |
including | 216.0 | 276.0 | 60.0 | 2.50 | 0.02 | 84 | 79 | 40 | 0.26 | Aplite | |
DDH PL-052-21 | Planned to test between holes PL-041-19 and PL-043-19 and east of Channels 37 and 38. The hole intersected three main mineralized pegmatite zones (with minor metavolcanic horizons) 21 to 72m wide correlating well with zones intersected in PL-043-19 to the east. Li2O grades are slightly lower at 0.8% Li2O over 25.3m (46.5-71.8m), 1.11% Li2O over 21.8m (107.2-129m) and 1.2% Li2O over 72.1m (154.4-226.5m) | ||||||||||
Zone | From | To | Width | Li2O | Cs2O | Ta2O5 | Nb2O5 | SnO2 | Rb2O | Unit | |
Lithium Enriched | 46.5 | 71.8 | 25.3 | 0.80 | 0.02 | 72 | 32 | 34 | 0.12 | Pegmatite/metavolcanic | |
including | 46.5 | 51.7 | 5.2 | 1.96 | 0.01 | 70 | 33 | 41 | 0.12 | Pegmatite | |
Lithium Enriched | 107.2 | 129.0 | 21.8 | 1.11 | 0.04 | 98 | 59 | 100 | 0.22 | Pegmatite with minor metavolcanic | |
including | 112.3 | 128.3 | 16.0 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 123 | 72 | 124 | 0.25 | Pegmatite with minor metavolcanic | |
Lithium Enriched | 154.4 | 226.5 | 72.1 | 1.20 | 0.02 | 90 | 52 | 68 | 0.25 | Pegmatite with minor metavolcanic | |
including | 163.3 | 225.9 | 62.6 | 1.29 | 0.02 | 93 | 55 | 69 | 0.26 | Pegmatite with minor metavolcanic | |
including | 195.5 | 225.9 | 30.5 | 1.57 | 0.01 | 93 | 53 | 43 | 0.25 | Pegmatite with minor metavolcanic | |
Lithium Enriched | 235.5 | 246.5 | 11.0 | 1.10 | 0.02 | 99 | 65 | 92 | 0.21 | Aplite with minor metavolcanics | |
including | 236.1 | 242.0 | 5.9 | 1.53 | 0.01 | 121 | 65 | 101 | 0.22 | Aplite |
Table 2: Details of Mineralized Intersections in Surface Channels
Spark Channels | Two channels were cut; CH-48 was cut 30m WSW of CH-44 along the most southwestern portion of the exposed pegmatite and CH-50 was cut 45m WSW of CH-33 (broken into two segments). The entire 15m of CH-48 averaged 1.75% Li2O while the initial 10m of CH-50 averaged 1.28% Li2O and the last 22m was higher at 1.85% Li2O. | ||||||||||
Zone | From | To | Width | Li2O | Cs2O | Ta2O5 | Nb2O5 | SnO2 | Rb2O | Unit | |
CH-48 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 1.75 | 0.01 | 113 | 97 | 57 | 0.29 | Pegmatite | |
including | 2.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 2.08 | 0.01 | 83 | 88 | 40 | 0.23 | Pegmatite | |
including | 10.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 2.07 | 0.01 | 102 | 79 | 53 | 0.32 | Pegmatite | |
CH-50 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 1.28 | 0.01 | 68 | 105 | 50 | 0.23 | Aplite-Pegmatite | |
including | 2.0 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 1.54 | 0.01 | 65 | 99 | 50 | 0.25 | Aplite-Pegmatite | |
CH-50 | 10.0 | 17.0 | 7.0 | Pegmatite persists but unable to cut channel due to overburden | Aplite-Pegmatite | ||||||
CH-50 | 17.0 | 39.0 | 22.0 | 1.85 | 0.02 | 118 | 88 | 52 | 0.24 | Pegmatite with minor metavolcanics | |
including | 18.0 | 27.0 | 9.0 | 2.19 | 0.02 | 124 | 91 | 50 | 0.30 | Pegmatite |
Table 3: Summary of Drill Holes
Geomechanical | Date Drilled | UTM Zone 15N (NAD83) | Collar Orient | Metres Drilled | ||||||
Start | End | Easting | Northing | (mASL) | Azim | Dip | Start | End | ||
Phase X | PL-GDH-08-21 | 2021-09-19 | 2021-09-26 | 472,746 | 5,829,496 | 355.0 | 355 | -60 | 0 | 220.5 |
Total metres drilled | 220.5 | |||||||||
Delineation | Date Drilled | UTM Zone 15N (NAD83) | Collar Orient | Metres Drilled | ||||||
Start | End | Easting | Northing | (mASL) | Azim | Dip | Start | End | ||
Phase X | PL-050-21 | 2021-09-26 | 2021-10-03 | 472,746 | 5,829,494 | 359.0 | 170 | -70 | 0 | 431 |
PL-051-21 | 2021-10-03 | 2021-10-23 | 472,687 | 5,829,527 | 358.0 | 180 | -60 | 0 | 346.3 | |
PL-052-21 | 2021-10-23 | 2021-10-27 | 472,815 | 5,829,593 | 359.0 | 160 | -50 | 0 | 291 | |
PL-053-21 | 2021-10-27 | 2021-11-01 | 472,766 | 5,829,566 | 360.0 | 177 | -55 | 0 | 349.5 | |
Total metres drilled | 1,417.8 |
Table 4: Summary of Channels
Channel | Date Samples | UTM Zone 15N (NAD83) | Orientation | Metres Cut | ||||||
Start Date | End Date | Easting | Northing | (mASL) | Azimuth | Dip | Start | End | ||
Spark | CH-48 | 2021-09-18 | 2021-09-19 | 472,700 | 5,829,398 | 342.0 | 350 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
CH-50* | 2021-10-23 | 2021-10-25 | 472,696 | 5,829,480 | 354.8 | 145 | 0 | 0 | 39 | |
* Pegmatite section from 10 to 17m was not cut because of overburden |
Drill holes PL-050-21 and PL-051-21 were planned to fill-in between existing drill holes and to test to the southern continuity of the mineralized pegmatite's main body currently defined. PL-050-21 was collared in the pegmatite near PL-GDH-08-21 which intersected 95m of mineralized pegmatite to the north. PL-050-21 was steepened to -70°. Aside from a few thin mafic zones, a total of 405m of pegmatite averaging 1.5% Li2O was intersected. The mineralized pegmatite intersected represents a horizontal width of 143m and a vertical depth of 392m. PL-051-21, drilled at -60° set-up between PL-042-19 and PL-044-19 and to "scissor" PL-039-19, intersected predominately pegmatite with intervals of mafic metavolcanics a few metres to 25m wide from surface to 302m. The total pegmatite intersected between surface and 302m downhole includes 264m averaging 1.6% Li2O.
Hole PL-052-21 was drilled to test between holes PL-041-19 and PL-043-19 and east of Channels 37 and 38 (Figure 2). The hole intersected three main mineralized pegmatite zones 21 to 72m wide correlating well with zones intersected in PL-043-19 to the east. Li2O grades are slightly lower between 0.8% Li2O and 1.2% Li2O. Minor metavolcanics occur within the pegmatitic zones.
During the drill program, two addition channels were cut and sampled on the Spark outcrop surface (Table 4 and Figures 2 and 3). Channel CH-48 was cut along the farthest southwest exposure at the top of a ridge above the collar for DDH PL-039-19. The 15m channel of pegmatite averaged 1.75% Li2O. The second channel, CH-50 located to the north of CH-48 and between holes PL-050-21 and PL-051-21 was cut in two segments with a 7m gap between 10m and 17m due to overburden. The initial 10m of aplite-pegmatite averaged 1.28% Li2O and the last 22m of pegmatite was higher at 1.85% Li2O.
Due Diligence
All scientific and technical information in this release has been reviewed and approved by Garth Drever, P.Geo., the qualified person (QP) under the definitions established by National Instrument 43-101. Under Frontier's QA/QC procedures, all drilling was completed by Chenier Drilling Ltd. of Val Caron, ON using thin walled BTW drill rods (4.2 cm core diameter) and a Reflex ACT III oriented core system. Using the Reflex system, the drill core was oriented and marked as it was retrieved at the drill. The core was boxed and delivered to the Frontier core shack where it was examined, geologically logged, and marked for sampling. The core was photographed prior to sampling. Using a rock saw, the marked sample intervals were halved with one half bagged for analysis. Sample blanks along with lithium, rubidium and cesium certified reference material was routinely inserted into the sample stream in accordance with industry recommended practices. Field duplicate samples were also taken in accordance with industry recommended practices. The samples were placed in poly sample bags and transported to Red Lake by Frontier employees and then shipped to AGAT Laboratories Ltd. (AGAT) in Mississauga, Ontario for processing and quantitative multi-element analysis. AGAT is an ISO accredited laboratory. The core is stored on site at the Pakeagama Lake exploration camp.
About Frontier Lithium
Frontier Lithium is a preproduction business that is targeting to become a manufacturer of battery-quality lithium materials to support electric vehicle and battery supply chains in North America. Frontier owns the PAK Lithium Project which contains one of North America's highest-grade, large-tonnage hard-rock lithium resources in the form of a rare low-iron spodumene. The project continues to have significant exploration upside with potential to increase the lithium resource. The Company is a pure-play lithium development opportunity with the largest land position in the Electric Avenue, a premium lithium mineral district located in Northern Ontario.
About PAK Lithium Project
The PAK Lithium Project contains a tier one lithium resource in North America and is one of the global top three premium resources by quality. A 2021 preliminary economic assessment (National Instrument 43-101 technical report titled "Pak Property" by BBA Engineering Ltd., issued on April 5, 2021) delivered a fully integrated lithium operation from the resource to achieve downstream conversion plan for production of battery-quality lithium salts. The study resulted in an after-tax net present value (discounted at 8 per cent) of $974-million (U.S.) with a 21-per-cent internal rate of return. The Project encompasses 26,774 hectares at the south end of Ontario's Electric Avenue, the largest land package hosting premium lithium-bearing pegmatites in Ontario. The Project is supported by a measured and indicated resource of 10.49 million tonnes (Mt) averaging 1.78 per cent lithium oxide (Li2O) and inferred resource of 18.48 Mt averaging 1.45 per cent Li2O.The Project covers 65 kilometres of the Electric Avenue's length and remains largely unexplored; however, since 2013, the company has delineated two premium spodumene-bearing lithium deposits (PAK and Spark), located 2.3 kilometres apart. Considerable exploration upside is supported on the PAK Lithium Project through two other spodumene-bearing discoveries: the Bolt pegmatite (located between the PAK and Spark deposits), as well as the Pennock pegmatite (30 kilometres northwest of PAK Deposit within the project claims).
Forward-looking Statements
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. This release includes certain statements that may be deemed "forward-looking statements". All statements in this release, other than statements of historical facts, that address future production, reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities and events or developments that the Company expects are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and those actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. For more information on the Company, Investors should review the Company's registered filings available at sedar.com.
Last Trade: | US$0.34 |
Daily Volume: | 0 |
Market Cap: | US$76.480M |
October 07, 2024 August 23, 2024 |
Hillcrest Energy Technologies is a clean technology company developing high value, high performance power conversion technologies and digital control systems for next-generation powertrains and grid-connected renewable...
CLICK TO LEARN MOREDevvStream provides upfront capital for sustainability projects in exchange for carbon credit rights. Through these rights, the company generates and manages carbon credits by utilizing the most technologically advanced...
CLICK TO LEARN MORECOPYRIGHT ©2022 GREEN STOCK NEWS